Big News at Brinks
Brinks Sweeps MIP North American Awards - Midwest
- Patent Litigation Firm of the Year – Midwest
- Trademark Prosecution Firm of the Year – Midwest
- Trademark Litigation Firm of the Year – Midwest
Brinks was also named among the top five contenders in the regional awards category of Patent Prosecution and the national categories of Patent and Trademark Litigation.
To view more, click here.
Now that the Supreme Court decision in Bilski has issued, what impact will it have on existing patents, patents in litigation and future patent prosecution methods? Brinks speakers present a review of the decision and a lively discussion on the issues to consider.
Click on the video below to see a brief preview of this program.
The player will show in this paragraph
Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione Recognized as Top IP Firm in Illinois, >>
Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione Appoints Vander Schaaf to Lead Washington >>
Brinks Recognized for Pro Bono Contributions to the Federal Circuit >>
Brinks Attorney Receives CORP! Magazine Salute to Diversity Award >>
Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione Hosts 2010 Summer Legal Institute Luncheon >>
Federal Circuit Addresses Standing in False Patent Marking Case >>
The Supreme Court Rules on Bilski v. Kappos, No. 08-964 >>
Federal Circuit Clarifies Law On False Marking With Expired Patents >>
Second Circuit Holds eBay Not Liable to Tiffany for Direct or Contributory >>
Biosimilar Provisions Enacted in Health Care Bill >>
Federal Circuit Reaffirms The Existence Of A Written Description Requirement >>
PLI's Patent Litigation 2010 Seminar, October 14-15, 2010 >>
D. Young & Company Life Sciences Patent Seminar, October 4, 2010 >>
Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago's Patent Law Symposium, October 1, 2010 >>
Midwest Clean Tech 2010 Conference and Exhibition, September 14-15, 2010 >>
Open-Source Software Doesn't Mean It's Unprotected >>
The Supreme Court's Bilski Decision: Did Anything Change? >>
Social Networking Sites May Present Difficult Intellectual Property >>
When You and Your Contingency Fee Client Disagree >>
IP: Effects of ResQNet.com v. Lansa Are Unclear >>